Greenes News Letter

--- On Sun, 5/3/09, Sharon4Anderson@aol.com wrote:

From: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
Subject: Re: Our very first Newsletter [please forward]
To: wm@greenes.us
Date: Sunday, May 3, 2009, 1:48 PM

Thanks http://sicko-citystpaul.blogspot.com

In a message dated 5/3/2009 12:37:57 P.M. Central Daylight Time, wm@greenes.us writes:

IT IS BIGGER THAN ANYONE COULD HAVE EVER IMAGINED THANK YOU Each and Every One of You!!! References for study include http://www.greenes.us, as well as aboutus.html, notanagency.html, truckdrivers.html, Karenspage.html, karensmessage.html, Billspage.html, services.html, contactus.html, truth_attack.html, civildocket.html, Donate.html. America: Freedom to Fascism Trailer (4 min) Entire Movie ( 1:49) “Give Me Liberty – Not Debt Bondage Of Our Children And Our Children’s Children” THIS IS OUR VERY FIRST E-MAILING/NEWSLETTER FROM WWW.GREENES.US ON BEHALF OF THOSE CONGRESSMEN AND SENATORS WHO HAVE REFUSED TO ACT RESPONSIBLY!!! "I have no hesitation in declaring that the tax on any useful occupation can not be defined in any form of conscience or of common sense. To tax a man for trying to make a living for his family is such a patent and gross injustice that it should deter any legislature from perpetrating it." 44 Congressional Record, 1702 (1909). (Bolded Emphasis Added). As explained in our past email, under the guise of the United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, which is a Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, 199 Senate Russell Building, Washington, DC 20510, represented by Democrats Carl Levin Chairman (D-MI), Thomas R. Carper (D-DE), Mark L. Pryor (D-AR), Claire McCaskill (D-MO), Jon Tester (D-MT), Michael Bennet (D-CO), and Republicans Tom Coburn Acting Ranking Member (R-OK), Susan M. Collins (R-ME), John McCain (R-AZ), and John Ensign (R-NV), the IRS has merged with certain arrogant government tyrants in the name of the Department of Homeland Security to produce the Biggest Conspiracy I have ever seen. It’s got RICO all over it, but because the set of foreign trusts represented as the IRS now extend to the Department of Homeland Security where action have gone international it is bigger than anyone can ever imagine. BACKGROUND_ON_THE_IRS It was the Act of July 1, 1862 which created the Office of the Commissioner of the IRS (Glavey v. United States, 182 U.S. 595, 607, 21 S.Ct. 891 (1901)), but that Act (and associated acts) was repealed by the adoption of the Revised Statutes of 1873 and “direct taxes [within the 48 continental United States] without apportionment was forbidden” (See Pollock v. Farmer’s Loan & Trust Co., 158 U.S. 601 (1895); Chas. C. Steward Mach. Co. v. Davis, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582 (1937)). Knowledge of this fact was, in part, the reason we brought our Qui Tam Action (Case No. 08-cv-0280) against the Named Accused “Government Contractor (the IRS)” as the Trust (internal revenue) listed at 31 USC § 1321(a)(2) which was created under the passage of Reorganization Act No. 1189 dated July 2, 1904, and which resulted in the creation of the offices of “Bureau of Internal Revenue” on August 1, 1904. HOW THIS RELATES TO OUR SUIT AGAINST THE IRS We identified the Trust listed at 31 USC § 1321(a)(2) simply because (1) it preexisted the similar Trust (Internal Revenue) listed at 31 USC § 1321(a)(62) and (2), the Trust (Internal Revenue) listed at 31 USC § 1321(a)(62) simply extended the same Taxing Powers to Puerto Rico as another of the United States’ possessions since 1898, becoming a commonwealth in 1952, and because 50 USC § 1801(o) defines the term “State” so as to have meanings which include any “State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, and any territory or possession of the United States” and because, (3) the Act of July 1, 1862 was repealed by the adoption of the Revised Statutes of 1873. “If money is wanted by Rulers who have in any manner oppressed the People, they may retain it until their grievances are redressed, and thus peaceably procure relief, without trusting to despised petitions or disturbing the public tranquility.” Continental Congress To Inhabitants of Quebec, an Act passed unanimously by the Congress. Journals of the Continental Congress. Journals 1:105-113. What all of this means in the context of the various sections of US Code including 31 USC § 3801(6) and 26 USC § 7701(a)(1) is that the Trust itself is a “person” liable for the acts of a Commissioner and/or Internal Revenue Officers in which operations exist outside of the Trust’s geographical application (i.e., in this case even when the word “State” its’ meaning is such that it is limited in terms of the nation's federal district(s) including District of Columbia relative to insular possessions of the United States) and finally, (5) given that (a) the Act of July 1, 1862 was repealed by the adoption of the Revised Statutes of 1873, (b) the taxing authority authorized pursuant to Article 4 § 3(2) involves a jurisdiction of the Trust listed at 31 USC § 1321(a)(2) which is limited in terms of the insular possessions of the United States and/or the District of Columbia (i.e., the nation's federal district(s)), and as such, we have submitted that cases like Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425, 441, 6 S.Ct. 1121 (1886) are a testimony to our assertions that Congress has never authorized the Named Accused “Government Contractor (31 USC § 1321(a)(2))” (IRS) to operate or encroach into 50 States of the Union and is therefore is liable for the acts of a Commissioner and/or Internal Revenue Officers in which operations exist outside of the Trust’s geographical application (i.e., limited in terms of the nation's federal district(s) including the District of Columbia relative to insular possessions of the United States) which violate the fundamental rights of the People for which there is protection in the Federal Constitution (see Chas. C. Steward Mach. Co. v. Davis, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582 (1937)). Treasury Order 150-06, July 9, 1953, is the only authoritative document under which the Bureau of Internal Revenue was changed to the Internal Revenue Service, thereby creating the illusion of the Internal Revenue Service (which was not created by Congress, as required by Article I § 8, clause 18 of the Constitution of the United States) as an actual agency of the Department of the Treasury with all regulations, mimeographs, forms, and other Internal Revenue and Treasury documents amended to conform to Treasury Order 150-06, and although the IRS’ Districts and Boundaries are to have been established by the President 26 U.S.C. § 7621, there are no implementing regulations for 26 U.S.C. § 7621 which authorizes the President to establish revenue districts within the 50 States of the Union [For delegation to Secretary of the Treasury of authority vested in President by this section, see section 1(g) of Ex. Ord. No. 10289, Sept. 17, 1951, 16 F.R. 9499, as amended, set out as a note under section 301 of Title 3, whereby the ONLY exception in terms of the subject of “revenue districts” is that, according to the National Archive and Records Administration the only “implementing regulations” are for 26 USC 7601 and 7602 for issues pertaining to alcohol importation (i.e., 7601—7606…27 Part 70 & 7602…27 Parts 170, 296).] . And of course, knowledge of all this was a part of the reason my wife and I filed our "public interest suit" which involves many Constitutional Rights Violations including Peonage, Major Fraud, Mail and Bank Fraud, and sets forth thirty-eight pages of Causes of Action, listing fifty-eight separate Causes of Action which have been developed against the IRS as a Government Contractor rather than the United States. Causes of Action include that IRS Officials were involved in the suppression of evidence submitted to the Senate Finance Committee (Exhibit 3), following which IRS Officials publicly announced that WTP Petitions were being responded to with enforcement actions (Exhibit 4). All of this, of course, has been followed by many other enforcement actions essentially meant to overthrow the Constitution and have even been perpetrated upon the District Court in which falsified damages/and IRS falsification of damages (False Claims) includes Fraud upon the Court in a § 6700 suit against our participating organization (United States of America v. Robert L. Schulz, We the People Foundation for Constitutional Education, Inc., and We the People Congress (Case No. 1:07-cv-0352)), in violation of our Rights of Privacy and Free Association. “The privilege of giving or withholding our moneys is an important barrier against the undue exertion of prerogative which if left altogether without control may be exercised to our great oppression; and all history shows how efficacious its intercession for redress of grievances and reestablishment of rights, and how improvident would be the surrender of so powerful a mediator.” Thomas Jefferson: Reply to Lord North, 1775. Papers 1:225. BUT AGAIN, IT IS BIGGER THAN ANYONE COULD HAVE EVER IMAGINED We have presented our suit as a “public interest suit” and had come before the US District Court for Northern New York and now before the 2nd Circuit US Court of Appeals in the spirit and intent that there is nothing so wrong with our government that what is right with our government can’t correct, and as early as last month we still held hope, but we have gotten into something here which is bigger than anyone could have imagined, for now we have become aware of the fact that under the guise of the United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, which is a Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, the set of foreign trusts represented as the IRS now extend to the Department of Homeland Security where action have gone international it is bigger than anyone could have ever imagined. Although I’ll still need help with the traveling expenses and parking fees, etc., to go down to the Court of Appeal in New York City to present the Appeal, it is precisely because of the donations from others that we go on, and as we have explained, we are now moving again before the 2nd Circuit USCA (08-06284-cv), where we are asking the USCA to Vacate the District Court’s most recent Order And REMAND the case back to the USDC For Northern New York, in Albany New York for a second time. If that happens, it will mean that the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals agrees with us and allows us to sue the IRS independent of the United States and the case will be opened up for joiners. I don’t know though – I mean the very idea that the IRS is now operating under the guise of the United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs seems mind boggling to me. In any event, if the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals agrees with us and allows us to sue the IRS independent of the United States, at that point, all joiners will automatically have the signatory status of “Private Attorneys General” (de jure) and guaranteed protections pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1988, Qualified Criminal Investigators pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1510 and Federal Witnesses pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1512. Blessings, Bill As you might imagine and as you can plainly see from all of the above, this has been a LOT for us (my wife and I) to do, and, at times, it is hard to fully realize that we are not so alone in all this. THANK YOU Each and Every One of You!!! References for further study include http://www.greenes.us, as well as aboutus.html, notanagency.html, truckdrivers.html, Karenspage.html, karensmessage.html, Billspage.html, services.html, contactus.html, truth_attack.html, civildocket.html, Donate.html. You have received this message either because you have subscribed or another subscriber submitted your name to this mailing list. The purpose of this mailing list is to keep those interested up-dated on our case as presented at http://www.greenes.us/civildocket.html. If you do not wish to receive periodic emails from us, please click here to unsubscribe.