Sunday, May 3, 2009

Greenes News Letter

--- On Sun, 5/3/09, Sharon4Anderson@aol.com wrote:

From: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
Subject: Re: Our very first Newsletter [please forward]
To: wm@greenes.us
Date: Sunday, May 3, 2009, 1:48 PM

In a message dated 5/3/2009 12:37:57 P.M. Central Daylight Time, wm@greenes.us writes:

IT IS BIGGER THAN ANYONE

COULD HAVE EVER IMAGINED

THANK YOU Each and Every One of You!!!

References for study include http://www.greenes.us, as well as aboutus.html, notanagency.html, truckdrivers.html, Karenspage.html, karensmessage.html, Billspage.html, services.html, contactus.html, truth_attack.html, civildocket.html, Donate.html.

America:

Freedom to Fascism Trailer

(4 min)

Entire Movie

( 1:49)

“Give Me Liberty – Not Debt Bondage Of Our Children And Our Children’s Children”

THIS IS OUR VERY FIRST E-MAILING/NEWSLETTER FROM WWW.GREENES.US ON BEHALF OF THOSE CONGRESSMEN AND SENATORS WHO HAVE REFUSED TO ACT RESPONSIBLY!!!

"I have no hesitation in declaring that the tax on any useful occupation can not be defined in any form of conscience or of common sense. To tax a man for trying to make a living for his family is such a patent and gross injustice that it should deter any legislature from perpetrating it." 44 Congressional Record, 1702 (1909). (Bolded Emphasis Added).

As explained in our past email, under the guise of the United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, which is a Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, 199 Senate Russell Building, Washington, DC 20510, represented by Democrats Carl Levin Chairman (D-MI), Thomas R. Carper (D-DE), Mark L. Pryor (D-AR), Claire McCaskill (D-MO), Jon Tester (D-MT), Michael Bennet (D-CO), and Republicans Tom Coburn Acting Ranking Member (R-OK), Susan M. Collins (R-ME), John McCain (R-AZ), and John Ensign (R-NV), the IRS has merged with certain arrogant government tyrants in the name of the Department of Homeland Security to produce the Biggest Conspiracy I have ever seen. It’s got RICO all over it, but because the set of foreign trusts represented as the IRS now extend to the Department of Homeland Security where action have gone international it is bigger than anyone can ever imagine.

BACKGROUND_ON_THE_IRS

It was the Act of July 1, 1862 which created the Office of the Commissioner of the IRS (Glavey v. United States, 182 U.S. 595, 607, 21 S.Ct. 891 (1901)), but that Act (and associated acts) was repealed by the adoption of the Revised Statutes of 1873 and “direct taxes [within the 48 continental United States] without apportionment was forbidden” (See Pollock v. Farmer’s Loan & Trust Co., 158 U.S. 601 (1895); Chas. C. Steward Mach. Co. v. Davis, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582 (1937)).

Knowledge of this fact was, in part, the reason we brought our Qui Tam Action (Case No. 08-cv-0280) against the Named Accused “Government Contractor (the IRS)” as the Trust (internal revenue) listed at 31 USC § 1321(a)(2) which was created under the passage of Reorganization Act No. 1189 dated July 2, 1904, and which resulted in the creation of the offices of “Bureau of Internal Revenue” on August 1, 1904.

HOW THIS RELATES TO OUR SUIT AGAINST THE IRS

We identified the Trust listed at 31 USC § 1321(a)(2) simply because (1) it preexisted the similar Trust (Internal Revenue) listed at 31 USC § 1321(a)(62) and (2), the Trust (Internal Revenue) listed at 31 USC § 1321(a)(62) simply extended the same Taxing Powers to Puerto Rico as another of the United States’ possessions since 1898, becoming a commonwealth in 1952, and because 50 USC § 1801(o) defines the term “State” so as to have meanings which include any “State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, and any territory or possession of the United States” and because, (3) the Act of July 1, 1862 was repealed by the adoption of the Revised Statutes of 1873.

“If money is wanted by Rulers who have in any manner oppressed the People, they may retain it until their grievances are redressed, and thus peaceably procure relief, without trusting to despised petitions or disturbing the public tranquility.” Continental Congress To Inhabitants of Quebec, an Act passed unanimously by the Congress. Journals of the Continental Congress. Journals 1:105-113.

What all of this means in the context of the various sections of US Code including 31 USC § 3801(6) and 26 USC § 7701(a)(1) is that the Trust itself is a “person” liable for the acts of a Commissioner and/or Internal Revenue Officers in which operations exist outside of the Trust’s geographical application (i.e., in this case even when the word “State” its’ meaning is such that it is limited in terms of the nation's federal district(s) including District of Columbia relative to insular possessions of the United States) and finally, (5) given that (a) the Act of July 1, 1862 was repealed by the adoption of the Revised Statutes of 1873, (b) the taxing authority authorized pursuant to Article 4 § 3(2) involves a jurisdiction of the Trust listed at 31 USC § 1321(a)(2) which is limited in terms of the insular possessions of the United States and/or the District of Columbia (i.e., the nation's federal district(s)), and as such,

we have submitted that cases like Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425, 441, 6 S.Ct. 1121 (1886) are a testimony to our assertions that Congress has never authorized the Named Accused “Government Contractor (31 USC § 1321(a)(2))” (IRS) to operate or encroach into 50 States of the Union and is therefore is liable for the acts of a Commissioner and/or Internal Revenue Officers in which operations exist outside of the Trust’s geographical application (i.e., limited in terms of the nation's federal district(s) including the District of Columbia relative to insular possessions of the United States) which violate the fundamental rights of the People for which there is protection in the Federal Constitution (see Chas. C. Steward Mach. Co. v. Davis, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582 (1937)).

Treasury Order 150-06, July 9, 1953, is the only authoritative document under which the Bureau of Internal Revenue was changed to the Internal Revenue Service, thereby creating the illusion of the Internal Revenue Service (which was not created by Congress, as required by Article I § 8, clause 18 of the Constitution of the United States) as an actual agency of the Department of the Treasury with all regulations, mimeographs, forms, and other Internal Revenue and Treasury documents amended to conform to Treasury Order 150-06, and although the IRS’ Districts and Boundaries are to have been established by the President 26 U.S.C. § 7621, there are no implementing regulations for 26 U.S.C. § 7621 which authorizes the President to establish revenue districts within the 50 States of the Union [For delegation to Secretary of the Treasury of authority vested in President by this section, see section 1(g) of Ex. Ord. No. 10289, Sept. 17, 1951, 16 F.R. 9499, as amended, set out as a note under section 301 of Title 3, whereby the ONLY exception in terms of the subject of “revenue districts” is that, according to the National Archive and Records Administration the only “implementing regulations” are for 26 USC 7601 and 7602 for issues pertaining to alcohol importation (i.e., 7601—7606…27 Part 70 & 7602…27 Parts 170, 296).] .

And of course, knowledge of all this was a part of the reason my wife and I filed our "public interest suit" which involves many Constitutional Rights Violations including Peonage, Major Fraud, Mail and Bank Fraud, and sets forth thirty-eight pages of Causes of Action, listing fifty-eight separate Causes of Action which have been developed against the IRS as a Government Contractor rather than the United States. Causes of Action include that IRS Officials were involved in the suppression of evidence submitted to the Senate Finance Committee (Exhibit 3), following which IRS Officials publicly announced that WTP Petitions were being responded to with enforcement actions (Exhibit 4). All of this, of course, has been followed by many other enforcement actions essentially meant to overthrow the Constitution and have even been perpetrated upon the District Court in which falsified damages/and IRS falsification of damages (False Claims) includes Fraud upon the Court in a § 6700 suit against our participating organization (United States of America v. Robert L. Schulz, We the People Foundation for Constitutional Education, Inc., and We the People Congress (Case No. 1:07-cv-0352)), in violation of our Rights of Privacy and Free Association.

“The privilege of giving or withholding our moneys is an important barrier against the undue exertion of prerogative which if left altogether without control may be exercised to our great oppression; and all history shows how efficacious its intercession for redress of grievances and reestablishment of rights, and how improvident would be the surrender of so powerful a mediator.” Thomas Jefferson: Reply to Lord North, 1775. Papers 1:225.

BUT AGAIN,

IT IS BIGGER THAN ANYONE

COULD HAVE EVER IMAGINED

We have presented our suit as a “public interest suit” and had come before the US District Court for Northern New York and now before the 2nd Circuit US Court of Appeals in the spirit and intent that there is nothing so wrong with our government that what is right with our government can’t correct, and as early as last month we still held hope, but we have gotten into something here which is bigger than anyone could have imagined, for now we have become aware of the fact that under the guise of the United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, which is a Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, the set of foreign trusts represented as the IRS now extend to the Department of Homeland Security where action have gone international it is bigger than anyone could have ever imagined.

Although I’ll still need help with the traveling expenses and parking fees, etc., to go down to the Court of Appeal in New York City to present the Appeal, it is precisely because of the donations from others that we go on, and as we have explained, we are now moving again before the 2nd Circuit USCA (08-06284-cv), where we are asking the USCA to Vacate the District Court’s most recent Order And REMAND the case back to the USDC For Northern New York, in Albany New York for a second time. If that happens, it will mean that the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals agrees with us and allows us to sue the IRS independent of the United States and the case will be opened up for joiners.

I don’t know though – I mean the very idea that the IRS is now operating under the guise of the United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs seems mind boggling to me. In any event, if the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals agrees with us and allows us to sue the IRS independent of the United States, at that point, all joiners will automatically have the signatory status of “Private Attorneys General” (de jure) and guaranteed protections pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1988, Qualified Criminal Investigators pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1510 and Federal Witnesses pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1512.

Blessings,

Bill

As you might imagine and as you can plainly see from all of the above, this has been a LOT for us (my wife and I) to do, and, at times, it is hard to fully realize that we are not so alone in all this. THANK YOU Each and Every One of You!!! References for further study include http://www.greenes.us, as well as aboutus.html, notanagency.html, truckdrivers.html, Karenspage.html, karensmessage.html, Billspage.html, services.html, contactus.html, truth_attack.html, civildocket.html, Donate.html.

You have received this message either because you have subscribed or another subscriber submitted your name to this mailing list. The purpose of this mailing list is to keep those interested up-dated on our case as presented at http://www.greenes.us/civildocket.html. If you do not wish to receive periodic emails from us, please click here to unsubscribe.

Posted by at No comments:

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Sharon4Anderson charges Judge Kathleen Gearin Case Fixing 62cv09-1163


Click here: Sharon4StateRep64A It has come to the attention of the undersigned
that chief Judge Ramsey County ie: District Court File no.62cv09-1163
is circumventing MN Const. Art.X Uniformity of Taxes by manulipating the current alleged 2008 Tax Delinquent File , usurping the IFP service by the Sheriff of all documents. and against the undersigned VA Widow, Attorney Pro Se Sharon-Peterson-Chergosky-Scarrella-Anderson.
as faxed from 651-266-8263 apparantly Mary Jurik today 4/15/09 14:30 unsigned dtd 9Apr09 by Chief Judge Kathleen Gearin 651-266-9178 rm.1210 Courthouse "who as been a Thorn in the Anderson's side for over 26 years"
triggering Death,Disability,Disparagement of Title unabated 42 USC 3631 by the State Attorney General, Rule 24.04, All Law Enforcement etc. re:
reducing the citizenery to povery.
This Outrage by this apparent Chief Judge Kathleen Gearin a single woman at War the State Law, State and Federal Constitutions is Criminal Behavior
Complaint to the Court Administrator Larry Dease 651-266-8266 re: RICO
Subj: Fwd: SharonScarrellaAndersonQuiTam Relatorv.StateofMN Register of Actions62cv...
Case Fixing is a Felony.
case fixing mn - Google Search Out of 3 thous alleged property taxes delinquent its bizzare that Affiant is the only one to answer/crosscomplaint.

From: Sharon4Anderson
To: tim.pawlenty@state.mn.us, attorney.general@state.mn.us, tamar.gronvall@state.mn.us, askdoj@usdoj.gov, rca@co.ramsey.mn.us, jean.stepan@co.ramsey.mn.us, dorrick@pioneerpress.com, DOR.taxpayeradvocate@state.mn.us
CC: Sharon4Anderson, john.harrington@ci.stpaul.mn.us, bob.fletcher@co.ramsey.mn.us, larry.dease@courts.state.mn.us, a_democracy@yahoo.com, BillDahn4, lynae.olson@courts.state.mn.us
Sent: 4/15/2009 12:10:57 P.M. Central Daylight Time
Subj: SharonScarrellaAndersonQuiTam Relatorv.StateofMN Register of Actions62cv00-1163
15Apr09 TAX DAY
AT ALL TIMES MATERIAL AFFIANT MUST IMPLEMENT E-COMMERCE
ECF_P165913_sa1299 Tax Filings, Voting,Commerce
To: Tamar N. GronvallOffice of the Attorney General, et al Media
102 State Capitol, St. Paul, MN 55155
Phone: (651) 296-6196 and 651-297-5922
Fax: (651) 297-4193 651-297-8265
TTY: (651) 297-7206
Website: http://www.yellowpages.state.mn.us/is/yellowpages.nsf/58ff101d11e1f3d786256b2900205e6a/f5b6835abe0139d286256b0500756dab?OpenDocument
Email: attorney.general@state.mn.us
Attorney General Lori Swanson

Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 8; Minnesota Rules, Chapters 2000-2009

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IS THE CHIEF LEGAL OFFICER for the state and is the legal advisor to the governor and all the constitutional officers. Her duties arise from the constitution, state statutes and common law. Every board, commission and agency of the state receives its legal counsel and representation from the attorney general.

The attorney general provides legal assistance to local officials, such as county attorneys and sheriffs, in their efforts to enforce laws, and the Public Protection Division prosecutes difficult or complex criminal cases at the request of local prosecutors, especially serious crimes against people. She represents and advocates for consumers in areas of consumer protection, charities oversight, antitrust enforcement and utilities regulation.
PLEASE TAKE LEGAL NOTICE: VA WIDOW, CANDIDATE FOR STATE AG re: http://sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com is the only Relator out of 3 thousand alleged 2008 Tax Delinquency's
to file electronically and by Fax Constitutionality of Fees/Assessments parlayed into Taxes re: Minn. Const.ArtX Uniformity , Apparantly the State Attorney General Lori Swanson and her Agents are acting contrary to State Law, forcing Repeal of the Tax Laws, indicating Treasonable Behavior?
SlideShare » Sharon4anderson's Slideshows Taxes cannot be assessed by Theft,Trespass,Treason,, Stealing Cars,Trailers,Personal Propertys by Fraud and Murder, unabated by the State Attorney is cause for Public Concern re: Tax Revolt.
Apparantly Assistant AG Tamar N. Gronvall has with wilful neglience refused to notfiy all Parties, that the Dept. of Revenue re: apparantly has NO INTEREST IN THE 3 THOUSAND ALLEGED DELINQUENCYS..........????? PDF Format, Blogged etc. http://taxthemax.blogspot.com
Click here: http://pa.courts.state.mn.us/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=1612475200
Logout Search Menu New Civil Search Back
Location : All MNCIS Sites - Case SearchHelp
Register Of Actions
Case No. 62-CV-09-1163
Delinquent Real Property Taxes for 2008§
§
§
§
§
Case Type:Administrative File
Date Filed:02/12/2009
Location:Ramsey Civil
Party Information
Lead Attorneys
Topic
Delinquent Real Property Taxes for 2008
STEPAN, JEAN
Retained
Events & Orders of the Court
DISPOSITIONS
02/12/2009
 Closed administratively
OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS
02/12/2009
Notice-Other published 18Mar09Maplewood - Ramsey County Review
03/31/2009 Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis Pdf under construction
03/31/2009 Order-Other
03/31/2009
Affidavit-Other
04/02/2009 Other Document Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18
04/06/2009 Affidavit of Service
04/06/2009 Correspondence
04/06/2009 Other Document
04/06/2009 Other Document
04/06/2009 Other Document
04/07/2009 Order to Remove
04/09/2009 Notice of Case Reassignment
04/10/2009
Correspondence "This Correspondance from Tamar N Gronvall to Lynae K.E.Olson Court Administrator, Ramsey County Dist. Court 15 W. Kelogg Blvd. Rm 602, St.Paul MN 55102
RE: Register of Actions 62cv09-1163 Alleged 2008 Delinquent Real Property Taxes IE: Sharon Scarrella Anderson:+ 3 THOUSAND OTHERS.re: http://www.review-news.com
"Dear Ms. Olson: Our office has receive on behalf of the State of Minnesota Department of Revenue the REGISTER OF ACTIONS in the above en titled matter. Please be advised the State o Minnesota Dep[artment of Revenue has no interest in he proceedings and will not be appearing or filing a response. I hope this notice is satisfactory " Sincerely, Tamar N. Gronvall Manager Tax Litigation
Assistant AG 651-297-5922 Fax: 297-8265

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower,Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com
/s/ Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913_sa1299 Attorney Pro Se_InFact,Private Attorney General,Candidate 2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Homestead Act of 1862
Sharon Scarrella Anderson's Page - We The People USA
political ?(Sharon4Anderson?)
Alliance for a Better Minnesota Sharon Anderson's Blog Click here: Sharon4Council file4[1]Shar_thune_22.pdf - Google Docs
Disclaimer on Site'sThe Electronic Communications Privacy Act MY FindLaw (ECPA) sets out the provisions for access, use, disclosure, interception and privacy protections of electronic communications. Sharon4Anderson Scribd pdf files. The law was enacted in 1986 and covers various forms of wire and electronic communications. According to the U.S. Code, electronic communications "means any transfer of signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electromagnetic, photo electronic or photo optical system that affects interstate or foreign commerce." ECPA prohibits unlawful access and certain disclosures of communication contents. Additionally, the law prevents government entities from requiring disclosure of electronic communications from a provider without proper procedure. The Legal Institute provides Title 18 of the U.S. Code, which encompasses ECPA. Blogger: Dashboard
NOTICE: This communication is not encrypted. This e-mail (including any attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521, and Electronic Communications Privacy Act The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers

From: Edward.Cleary@courts.state.mn.us
To: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
Sent: 4/15/2009 8:01:46 P.M. Central Daylight Time
Subj: Out of Office AutoReply: Sharon4StateRep64AImpeachment of Judge Kathleen Gearin 62cv09-1163

I am unavailable at this time. I will be back in chambers on Monday, April 20.

Posted by at No comments:

Saturday, April 11, 2009

QuiTam_Greenes_Private AG's_SharonAnderson

My wife and I had followed the work of National Lawman Chuck Conces where the rights of the PAG are a part of our original filings, but Brian Keith Meyer, who filed his copy years ago in Illinois, forwarded his copy the "Private Attorneys General" Document and I really liked it because it is a clear notarized statement where our rights are reserved under 42 U.S.C. 1988, 18 U.S.C. 1510 and as a Federal Witness under 18 U.S.C. 1512. Although Brian Keith Meyer's copy has worked very well for him, for our purposes I sent out the "Private Attorneys General" Document too soon, and others have helped me to understand the fact that there were just too many corrections in the older copies of it for me to not go all out in admitting my error.

You will notice that in this copy of "Private Attorneys General" Document I have eliminated all reference to Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of The House of Representatives, and out of fear that the use might be construed as being fraudulently used we eliminated the official emblem of the U.S. House of Representatives which is one of the two chambers of the United States Congress that was responsible for explicitly setting forth our rights as codified under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, 18 U.S.C. § 1510 and 18 U.S.C. § 1512.

Obviously I got over excited about the "Private Attorneys General" Document and released it without realizing the inherent problems. And yes I ASSumed too much; I made a mistake, but with the help of others I believe that this copy will be found acceptable!! ! After editing to insert your name and state etc., for printing, you will need to scale it to letter size. And, PLEASE get back to me if you find any additional problems with the doc!!!

Blessings,

Bill

Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)